INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION VOLUME I【2025|PDF|Epub|mobi|kindle电子书版本百度云盘下载】

INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION VOLUME IPDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

PART Ⅰ FOUNDATIONS OF NEGOTIATION THEORY AND PRACTICE3

1 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （1984）， ‘Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation：The Structure of Problem Solving’， UCLA Law Review， 31， pp.754-842.3

2 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （2009）， ‘Chronicling the Complexification of Negotiation Theory and Practice’， Negotiation Journal， 25， pp.415-29.93

3 Robert H.Mnookin （1993）， ‘Why Negotiations Fail： An Exploration of Barriers to the Resolution of Conflict’， Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution， 8，pp.235-49.109

4 Andrea Kupfer Schneider （2002）， ‘Shattering Negotiation Myths： Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style’， Harvard Negotiation Law Review， 7， pp.143-48； 162-97.125

5 Robert H.Mnookin （2003）， ‘When Not to Negotiate： A Negotiation Imperialist Reflects on Appropriate Limits’， University of Colorado Law Review， 74，pp.1077-107.167

6 James J.White （1980）， ‘Machiavelli and the Bar： Ethical Limitations on Lying in Negotiation’， American Bar Foundation Research Journal， 5， pp.926-38.199

7 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （2001）， ‘Negotiating with Lawyers， Men and Things： The Contextual Approach Still Matters’， Negotiation Journal， 17， pp.257-93.213

8 Randall L.Kiser， Martin A.Asher and Blakeley B.McShane （2008）， ‘Let’s Not Make a Deal： An Empirical Study of Decision Making in Unsuccessful Settlement Negotiations’， Journal of Empirical Legal Studies， 5， pp.551-91.251

PART Ⅱ FOUNDATIONS OF MEDIATION THEORY AND PRACTICE295

9 Lon L.Fuller （1971）， ‘Mediation -Its Forms and Functions’， Southern California Law Review， 44， pp.305-39.295

10 Howard Raiffa （1985）， ‘Post-Settlement Settlements’， Negotiation Journal， 1，pp.9-12.331

11 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （1995）， ‘The Many Ways of Mediation： The Transformation of Traditions， Ideologies， Paradigms， and Practices’， Negotiation Journal， 11， pp.217-42.335

12 Carol B.Liebman （2000）， ‘Mediation as Parallel Seminars： Lessons from the Student Takeover of Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall’， Negotiation Journal， 16， pp.157-82.361

13 Jean R.Sternlight （1999）， ‘Lawyers’ Representation of Clients in Mediation： Using Economics and Psychology to Structure Advocacy in a Nonadversarial Setting’， Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution， 14， pp.269-366.387

14 Leonard L.Riskin （1994）， ‘Mediator Orientations， Strategies and Techniques’， Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation， 12， pp.111-14.485

15 Marian Roberts （2005）， ‘Family Mediation： The Development of the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom’， Conflict Resolution Quarterly， 4， pp.509-26.489

16 Gary Friedman and Jack Himmelstein （2008）， ‘Nature Preserve： The Loop of Understanding’， in Challenging Conflict： Mediation Through Understanding， Chicago， IL： American Bar Association， pp.59-78.507

17 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （1993）， ‘Lawyer Negotiations： Theories and Realities - What We Learn from Mediation’， Modern Law Review， 56， pp.361-79.527

18 Lawrence Susskind （1981）， ‘Environmental Mediation and the Accountability Problem’， Vermont Law Review， 6， pp.1- 47.547

PART Ⅲ FOUNDATIONS AND ISSUES IN ARBITRATION AND HYBRID PROCESSES597

19 Jean R.Sternlight （2002）， ‘Is the U.S.Out on a Limb？ Comparing the US Approach to Mandatory Consumer and Employment Arbitration to that of the Rest of the World’， University of Miami Law Review， 56， pp.831-64.597

20 Carrie Menkel-Meadow （1991）， ‘Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture： A Tale of Innovation Co-opted or “the Law of ADR”’， Florida State University Law Review， 19， pp.1-46.631

PART Ⅳ CODA679

Coda679

Name Index683